International Institute for Middle East and Balkan Studies (IFIMES) from Ljubljana, Slovenia, regularly analyses developments in the Middle East, the Balkans and around the world. Prof. dr. Anis H. Bajrektarevic is professor in international law and global political studies, based in Vienna, Austria. In his comprehensive analysis entitled “Of Health and Nuclear Holocaust (Intentionality, Directionality and Outcome)” he is analysing the impact of Covid-19 pandemic on the society with tremendous socio-economic, demographic, cross-generational, political and psychosomatic consequences.
(Intentionality, Directionality and Outcome)
Particularly dark and accusatory but, as it will soon turn out, accurate was a part about silence. It deserves a full-length quotation here:
“Aegean theater of Ancient Greece was a place of astonishing revelations and intellectual excellence – a remarkable density and proximity, not surpassed up to our age. All we know about science, philosophy, sports, arts, culture and entertainment, stars and earth has been postulated, explored and examined then and there. Simply, it was a time and place of triumph of human consciousness, pure reasoning and sparkling thought. However, neither Euclid, Anaximander, Heraclites, Hippocrates (both of Chios, and of Cos), Socrates, Archimedes, Ptolemy, Democritus, Plato, Pythagoras, Diogenes, Aristotle, Empedocles, Conon, Eratosthenes nor any of dozens of other brilliant ancient Greek minds did ever refer by a word, by a single sentence to something which was their everyday life, something they saw literally on every corner along their entire lives. It was an immoral, unjust, notoriously brutal and oppressive slavery system that powered the Antique state. (Slaves have not been even attributed as humans, but rather as the ‘phonic tools/tools able to speak’.) This myopia, this absence of critical reference on the obvious and omnipresent is a historic message – highly disturbing, self-telling and quite a warning for the present day.”
And, now back to future of ‘20s.
Metapolitics of Health: The Age of Expired Human Rights
Definition of Health,
Preamble of the World Health Organisation (WHO) Constitution, 1948
It is an established fact that the quintessence of Nazism was not Hitler and the circle of darkness around him. It was rather a commonly shared ‘banality of crime’ atmosphere: Benevolent acceptance of ordinary village people living next to Auschwitz, Mauthausen, Dachau that the nation must be ‘purified’ …
The day when questioning stops and silent acceptance (especially among the well informed, well mobilised and educated ones) becomes a ‘new normal’ is a day when fascism walks in a big time. Of course, today we have a diagnosis for it: manufacturing consent through choice architecture. It is done via fear-imprisoned and media infantilised (returned to the pre-Oedipal phase) psychology of the de-socialised and alienated, an atomised one.
Hostage crisis: Appinion disguised as opinion – Who is really in charge?
Ecological Globalistan, Political Terroristan, the author
So, our C-19 response and its widespread synchronicity of measures and its timing (in the world that otherwise agrees on very little and rather late) illustrates – the argument goes – nothing else but a social pathology of hostage crisis: the non-transparent concentration of power, and our overall democracy recession – further bolstering the management of apathy via surveillance and social control systems. All that as lasting consequences of cutbacks, environmental holocaust, deintellectualisation, liberticide, privatisation (or PPP-ization) of key intergovernmental and vital national institutions, ill-aimed globalisation as well as of the fixation on overly allopathic, mandated (not a repurposed, but usually novel expensive and inadequately tested) drugs-centred healthcare, and lack of public data commons. Public health or private wealth? Pandemic or plundermic …
Urban communities of developed countries are especially hit hard. Within these groups, the vulnerable categories like pre- and early – school children, and elderly suffer the most. People there wonder if they are (aggressively) coerced to participate in something they fear from the beginning is a lie. No wonder that the trust in and support to governmental and intergovernmental institutions is rapidly deteriorating.
Ever larger number of citizens do not see the mainstream media (or pop culture celebrities) at service for the population, but as a cartel that follows a special interest. Dialogue and opinion is discouraged and silenced, if not, even sanctioned. It is of course energetically dismissed with the ‘conspiracy theory’ label – which is nothing else but a desperate attempt to trivialise legitimate concerns of society about apparent anomalies in the events or actions of state and non-state actors. Suppression has never halted searching; it rather boomeranged by bringing collapse to the centre following general distrust. Big media should visit these history chapters, too.
Moreover, our western, ‘modern’ medicine (which increasingly becomes set of believes instead of being constantly challenged resultant of empirical evidences) still falls short of consensus on a fundamental question: Is illness contracted (from outside) or created (conditions within our body). Hence, the faith in western medicine is in a free fall. Compromised generational contract and thinning social consensus are challenging our fabrics like never before in recorded history. People wonder, is the world today led by leaders or influencers/imposers.
The first real stress-test since the end of the WWII, the United Nations (UN) clearly did not pass. Many feel deeply disappointed with and disfranchised by the universal organisation and its global Agencies for their steady self-marginalisation (and reduction onto self-seeking entities). Is our cohesion irreversibly destroyed?
Early lockdowns of mid-March 2020 – often introduced through emotional blackmail, were justified by a need to flatten the curve of the ‘sudden’ virus (harmfulness, mortality and transmissibility) impact, since there were not enough hospital beds. In the meantime, the lockdowns were extended and widened, curves not arguably altered. Still, for the past 20 months, there is hardly any new hospital built in the EU although the non-essential medical services, at most cases, were suspended. Neither there was nor is any massive investment into general health prevention. The only visible infrastructure growth is in 5/6G network expansion.
Following a simple ratio that the one’s state of health is genetic expression of life-style choices made, it is no surprise that there are also growing speculations if the lockdown – as the most notorious expression of monofocal perspective and rejection to any scientifically contested, debate-based integrated judgment – is invasion or protection:
- Whether the aim is a herd-immunity or herd loyalty (and to it related growing, yet still unrefuted, rumours that the eventual ‘unsafe, unneeded and ineffective’ C-19 vaccine (or genoccine) might contain biohacking nano-properties which establish backdoor interface via extensively set 5/6G, besides viral interference and transduction as standard side-effects in the clinical trials ever since 2002)?
- And, if is there any back-to-normal exit from the crisis, or this disaster ‘turned into planetary terror, through global coup d’état’ will be exploited to further something already pre-designed (with a fear, not as a side-effect, but rather as a tool manufactured to gain control). Simply, is all that more related to the biotronics and demographics (IoT and Internet of Bodies) – ‘epsteinisation en masse’, than to health and economics or any common social purpose?
Over the past 30 years, every critical juncture had a similar epilogue: pardon and enhancement for the capital, a burden and suppression for the labour. The C-19 is no exception to it: Ever since early lockdowns of March 2020, the capital flows unhindered while the labour, ideas and humans are under the house arrest. The XXI century frontline is the right to health (incl. body integrity and informed consent) and labour, privacy and other fundamental human rights and liberties. (LMD, IV20)
Is the political, economic or moral triumph of the West still possible past this crisis?
Every crisis since Westphalia until the so-called financial crisis of 2008-09, political West exited in (what was seen as) moral triumph. What is in front of us? If the world is flat, will it become one big pharma Banana Republic – as many fear?
Earth provides enough to satisfy everyone’s needs, but not for a single man’s greed
The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith
Would all this be – in its epilogue – about the expansion of (the 4th industrial revolution caused) techno-totalitarian model of government as an alternative to liberal democracy (from one-party democracy to one-party autocracy)? Devolutionary singularisation into techno-feudalism as the highest stage of capitalism? Is now a time to return to the nation-state, a great moment for all dictators-in-waiting to finally build a cult of personality? Hence, will our democracy be electro-magnetised and vaccinated for a greater good (or greedier ‘god’)? Is the decolonisation (and deprivatisation) of global health a failed attempt? Will we (ever) be allowed to exit the year of 2020?
Turning human body into an (purposely unoptimized) operative system that needs constant updates and antivirus programs is a dangerous thought. The entire scientific community considers the attempt to mandate the experimental biological agent of unchecked reproductive toxicity and other side effects (while calling it the C-19 vaccine) as very troubling. Having these calls chiefly advocated and aggressively promoted by the handful of self-interest driven private companies – all accompanied with a contradictory and confusing governmental stance which is siding up with the industry it was supposed to regulate – is highly disturbing. No surprise that ever-larger societal segments perceive it as liberticidal warfare, not an enhancing welfare. The world that for over a century portrayed itself as Kantian is rapidly turning into a dark Hobbesian (immuno-apartheid) place. Is now anarchy just one step away?
One is certain, confronting the long-term interests of stakeholders with the short-term interests of shareholders, the private sector from both sides of Atlantic exercises disproportionate power in the technological share (infrastructure and data). It also largely benefits from the massive public research funds – especially in the fields such as bioinformatics, AI, nanorobotics, or geophysics engineering – while in return paying dismal, negotiable tax if any at all.
Far too often it comes with the nondisclosure agreements, liability outsourcing/ protections and other unilaterally beneficial legal instruments as well as with the close ties between the private sector, intelligence agencies and media.
The same applies to a big Pharma which – through pornography of (decontextualized) numbers over the widening fields of misery – increasingly dictates a non-preventive, monofocal approach to medicine and research, and controls reporting about it – not always in the name of our public health.
Does it provide for a new level of global centrality? Not at all.
The above represents the largest underreported (or ignored) threat to our democracy and future societal conduct.
Every colonization in our past was abrupt and chaotic, wild and shortsighted, and was dangerously confrontational. It happened in every known space – land, see/water, space, outer space, and finally cyber space. Difference between 18th century cowboy settler and the 20th century intercontinental ballistic missiles originators was not in intention (territory grab) but on the magnitude of impact for human life. Only massive regulatory effort saved mankind from global annihilation, of course after centuries of mutual (low-tech) destructions.
Now, as it seems, the attempt to colonize the sixth space is well on the way: Human body by nano-informational and biotronic means. (To a large extend it builds up on a previous massive privacy intrusion that the colonization of cyberspace has planetarily brought.) To ban the sixth space penetration all together – as it was a case with the arms race in outer space – or not, is still question of debate, but a need to regulate it decisively is beyond any doubt. It should go hand in hand with sanctioning of social weaponization of vaccine or similar one-solution-for-all medication.
Clearly, bioinformatics (including the synthetic biology and data-to-genes sequestration for data storage or data mining purpose) – as much as the geoengineering itself – is a dual-use technology. Past its formative age (with a digital infrastructure near completion), it has today a huge weaponization potential for at home and abroad, be it for state or non-state actors.
Consequently and urgently, this necessitates a comprehensive legislation which builds up on the Universal Charter of Human Rights and Nuremberg Code, and rests on its effective enforcement (with the monitoring of compliance mechanisms as set for the IAEA, OPCW, RC-BTWC and the Nagoya protocol), nationally and internationality, and for all actors.
Factchecking Otherness: Criminalisation of (different) opinion
Civil disobedience as the Constitutional Right
People have the right to know what those in power are doing, especially in times of crisis. Therefore, Europe’s eldest and the most comprehensive multilateral mechanism – Council of Europe, promulgated Convention on Access to Official Documents more than ten years ago in Tromsø, Norway (entering in force on 01 December 2020). This Charter is the first binding international legal instrument to recognise a general right of access to official documents held by public authorities.
As this author noted back in spring 2020: “It is amply clear from the C-19 event that the right to health is an issue for all. The search for a reliable cure for pandemics control is not a matter of private business, but of fundamental individual rights situated on higher levels of sociableness, as embedded in the UN and EU Charters, and being obligatory for each of the UN Specialized Agencies or EU bodies to comply with. (Not a fear-based manufactured giving-in, but the right for informed consent as an inseparable segment of the constitutionally endorsed right to health.)”
Even if the vaccine becomes the agreed or preferred option, it must be made available patent-free for all, and locally manufactured. However, binarization of debate onto a pro-and-con vaccine represents a dangerous reductionism and waste of planetary energy critically needed for a holistic and novel approach. There is no silver bullet for the European or world problems. Consequently, there is no solution in one-directional medical research in response to any pandemic, and in a single-blended (or centrally manufactured, hastily introduced) and mandated experimental medication for all. This especially refers to the genoccine. (Dogma is based on a blind belief; science necessitates constant multidimensional exploration. Science, especially a medical one, holds no single or absolute truth: “The closest it can get is to the least wrong answer – which must be contested constantly, literally every single day.)”
Proportionality of our (current and future) responses in Europe is another key issue. Hence, what presents itself as an imperative is the universal participation through intergovernmental mechanisms and popular control to it. That rule applies for at home and for abroad, as the Union has to comply with (and set example to) it urgently.
Growing particularisms in Brussels quarters, where (on taxpayers’ money and public trust), it is more and more the particular – be it individual, regional, national, lobby-groups driven – interest that prevails over the solid all-European project of our common presence purpose and future. Europe or EU Rope?
Past the Brexit, the Union has to be extra cautious about its chronic democracy-deficit, apparatchik alienation of Brussels, as well as the brewing concerns that the EU without UK becomes yet another greater Germany.
Prison of Nations – The Capitulation Treaties’ Facilitator?
The EU Parliamentary debates, 2020-21
b. Absence of any initiative to spark and enhance thorough, all-stakeholders democratic debates on the ongoing crisis and it ways out;
c. Turning a deaf ear to arbitrary movement restrictions imposed by narrow circles of executive branch in numerous occasions in number of MS;
d. Turning a blind eye to excessive use of police force against peaceful citizenry on streets in numerous occasions in number of MS;
d. Indifference and inaction on the suppression of media freedoms within and beyond the Block, while ignoring the increase in arbitrary censorship conducted by the foreign non-state and/or local state actors;
2. The EU did not protect general public health of its citizenry. On contrary, many of its decisions or inactions contributed to further deterioration of a long-term conditions of population of all generations especially children and youth; 
3. For almost two years of the looming crisis, the Union neither organised, nor called upon or participated at any international symposia on the C-19 crisis (health or any other aspect). However, at the same time Brussels very aggressively pushes for the experimental single solution for all as well as for the dubious digital Health Travel document. (Same EU Preliminaries already nicknamed the Union: ‘Facilitator of the self-inflicting Capitulation Treaties’);
4. Long neglected demographic-renewal of the EU is further compromised. Fertility measured by the RR (Replacement Ratio) is of all-time low, while the post-C-19 en mass sterility is acute but yet undiscussed. Scale of deindustrialisation of the Union coupled with its accelerating depopulation is close to the point of no-return. (Many start wondering if the EU is the Community for Progress or Prison of Nations);
5. Union did not stop fragmentation of the Block. On contrary, its accelatered and widened inter-regional rifts between (or even within) different member states;
6. The EU did not improve its standing within the wider European neighbourhood;
7. The Commission President repeated but unsolicited comments against the Human Rights fundamentals (including those on the mandates) irreparably undermine both standing of the Union, and the trust in German non-revisionism;
8. On each of the above, the Commission, Parliament and the rest of Brussels apparatus remains in denial – which triggers further loss of international credibility, tax-payers confidence and domestic support, and drifts the unionistic Project into irrelevance.
After all, the truth is plain to see; countries with the highly (deregulated and) privatised health sector are the C-19 worst offs (eg. USA) – as measured by the fatalities, overall socio-economic cost (incl. the long-term health prospects, or redistribution and inequalities), damage to the social consensus (safety and security), and the speed of recovery. Countries of the centralised health sector which resides strictly in public hands and is under popular control did and are still making it far better. Those among them that keep high respect for individual rights, liberties and freedoms (eg. Sweden) are by far the best achievers.
How the issues of health will be balanced with the human rights – as these two are not excluding but are complementing each other – is the fundamental issue for the future.
Additionally, how (geno and pheno) data are generated, stored and governed, and ultimately used will be the second defining issue of global public health (and planetary support to or conflict over it) in the coming decades. That very much includes a dubious imposition of exclusionary digital bio surveillance grid that some circles advocate as a presumptive recommendation to restore ‘normalcy’.
Opting for (corporate) interests over (societal) values or vice versa, will answer us the question about the model we will get in near future: authoritarian or democratic.
All in all, the two-year score is highly disturbing;
- The health threat is not eliminated, on contrary it became multifaceted and severer, while
- the human rights are standing closer to those in 1848 than to a 21st century.
Nowadays, not only the socio-economic one, but every aspect of Western vitality is also vanishing rapidly, making the prospect of triumph of its model (or its demographic relevance) less likely with every passing day. Hight time to accuse the silence?
Beyond the disputes about possible initial intentionality (allegedly inspired by the sectarian, class, demographic, environmental or any other drive), let us close this text by displaying the probable epilogue: An ever-larger number of military strategists see (unfolding of) the C-19 event as a (techno-)biological warfare.
Here comes the powerful reminder that history gives us: decisions to go to war were never based on facts but on perceptions. Therefore, make no mistake; the end game to any further continuation or escalation (of attempt to singularise the biological, chemo-electric and digital, and to centrally control it) is the nuclear holocaust which none of us will escape.
Thus, invading human body on the same principle as the colonization of the west followed the age of so-called Grand Discoveries. (Interestingly, then in XV century – almost as now in XXI – Chinese were the first to explore and circumvent, while the western peripheries of than global civilization only brutally followed and accelerated.)
Finally, misappropriating and monetizing this newly acquired space in the absence of expanding anywhere else: Treating human health like a business model and invading unconsented humans through the hijacked medicine. (Actually, what we consider as ‘medicine’ is also a political construct. There is a western medicine – which we falsely label as ‘medicine’. But, over half of this planet follows the Vedic, Chinese, Shaman, and several other traditional medicines in their approach to life health and nature.)
But to extend the context:
History of (what we, humans, describe as) technology is a story about primordial (survival-driven) fear far too often turned into a long line of violence towards all organic and inorganic systems on our planet. Too many times our technological breakthroughs were linked to destruction (with violence against nature and societies as means to introduce it), instead of being coupled with or supportive to creation. Otherwise, our millenniums-long technological march would have brought us to the Gates of Triumph in self-realisation of entire human race.
If historically our technological advancements (by its motive and method of introduction) only managed to accelerate frequency and severity of (disharmony and) alienating aggression on this planet, while repeatedly falling short to bring about everlasting self-realization of humans – than this anthropotechnic is based on confrontation (coercive introduction) and not on cooperation (support and inclusion).
Then both, its intensity and direction – corrosive, polarizing, disruptive and reductionistic; must be thoroughly re-examined.
No wonder that our technology (or to say: ‘’technology’) is seen by many as the developmental dead end. Cosmos means balance/perfect order, chaos is absence of it.
Our choice is hard but simple. As simple as never before.
Anis H. Bajrektarevic is chairperson and professor in international law and global political studies, Vienna, Austria. He has authored eight books (for American and European publishers) and numerous articles on, mainly, geopolitics energy and technology. Professor is editor of the NY-based GHIR (Geopolitics, History and Intl. Relations) journal, and editorial board member of several similar specialized magazines on three continents. His 9th book, ‘The European Union: Genesis, Institutions, Instruments” is scheduled for early 2022.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect IFIMES official position.
Ljubljana/Vienna, 3 February 2022
 IFIMES – International Institute for Middle East and Balkan Studies, based in Ljubljana, Slovenia, has Special Consultative status at ECOSOC/UN, New York, since 2018.
 The UN Secretary-General, Antonio Guterres is well aware of it: Addressing the Organisation’s General Assembly at the 75th anniversary (September 2020) he admitted: “… people continue to lose trust in political establishments. … widespread protests against inequality, discrimination, corruption and lack of opportunities all over the world – grievances that still need to be addressed, including with a renewed social contract.”
 In fact, in Germany and several other EU member states the number of hospital beds in the intensive care units is even reduced for up to 20% compared to its pre-C-19 capacities. Additional (politically polarising) controversy are millions of euros spent on diagnoses tests which are scientifically contested.
 In the formally neutral and peace-loving Austria – following the provisions of a strict autumn 2020 – spring 2021 lockdown – only the basic supplies shops were opened. However, besides the grocery stores, mobile phone shops and pharmacies, it also included the guns shops, while the schools, theatres, libraries and museums remained closed.
 There is an observable trend that – for the past few decades – our public health has been at first globalized, than centralized, with the ongoing privatization and its monopolization as the final phase.
 The year of ‘reptilian brain’ – 2020 recorded unprecedented planetary contractions and nearly a free-fall recession. Of course, it is misleadingly ascribed to the pandemic instead of being attributed to the C-19-related measures. Among the countries of the G-7 + G-20 group only China had scored growth. Cross-sectoral picture is the same – deep recession. Only the big tech and big pharma scored surpluses in 2020. (World Bank Report 2020). Figures for the first 3 quarters of 2021 confirm the trend, too.
 The extraordinary measures introduced in spring 2020 were and still are more administrative/political than they are scientific based. That starts with the very definition of pandemic (infection percentage threshold); goes on with the diagnostics tools and protocols as well as the way to proclaim someone infected or ill (PRC tests and number of cycles applied, or medical doctor thorough examination), and finally it culminates with a diagnosis of death (mandatory autopsy or not). Therefore, it is safe to say that the C-19 has – in its manifestation – far more political than the health elements. No wonder; Public health is a discipline of political science.
 Talks about ‘vax-passports’ falls under the same category. Not only that it is contrary to the ruling of the Council of Europe – conditioning freedom of movement with an exposure of personal medical record is contradicting any notion of Human Rights and every of its Charters. Liberties and freedoms are fundamental inalienable rights, not privileges (to be administratively or arbitrarily taken, given, conditioned, extended, renewed or dosed).
 “The pandemic has also reviled how imbalanced the relationship between the public and the private sector has become. In the US, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) invests some$40 billion a year on medical research and has been a key funder of the R&D of C-19 treatments and vaccines. But pharmaceutical companies are under no obligation to make the final product affordable to Americans, whose tax money is subsidising them in the first place. … It was a typical move for Big Pharma. … Even so, US drug prices are the highest in the world. Pharmaceutical companies also act against the public interest by abusing the patient process. … Equally bad deals have been made with Big Tech. In many ways, Silicon Valley is a product of the US government’s investments in the development of high-risk technologies. The National Science Foundation funded the research behind the search algorithm that made Google famous. The US Navy did the same for the GPS technology that Uber depends on. And the Defence Advanced Research Project Agency, part of the Pentagon, backed the development of the Internet, touchscreen technology, Siri, and every other key component in the iPhone. Taxpayers took risks when they invested in these technologies, yet most of the technology companies that have benefited failed to pay their fair share of taxes. Then they have the audacity to fight against regulations that would protect the privacy rights of the public. … the power of AI and other technologies being developed in Silicon Valley, a closer look shows that in these cases, too, it was high-risk public investment that laid the foundations” – states prof. Mazzucato (FAM 99/6/20)
 See, eg. the EU Pandemic Accelerator Act (April 2020) or the July 15th 2020 Suspension of the EU GMO-related legislation (the so-called EU Council adoption of the Commission’s proposal to accelerate clinical trials and the supply of medical product containing the GMOs) – all promulgated speed-track without a prior investigative scientific reports, hearings or debate (as if it is a Capitulation Agreement). These are now submitted to the European Court of Justice for a legality and impartiality judgment. In the same fashion the recently adopted European Democracy Action Plan (EDAP) leaves many ambiguities, while also massively contradicting the European Convention on Human Rights.
 All four belonging to the United Nations system: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), Review Conference to the Biological Weapons Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction (RC-BTWC), the Nagoya Protocol to the Biological Diversity Convention on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilisation (NP).
 The US Foreign Corrupt Practice Act of 1977 could be used as a model for the universally binding instrument to internationally prosecute and punish any corporation that pay bribes to foreign officials.
 German Constitution (Art. 20). Similar provisions are encapsulated in most of the national constitutions in Europe and beyond. It rests on a notion that the state and people are bound by the social contract within any given society, and that in case of a breach of confidence, citizenry has an inalienable natural right to disobedience.
 The face covering coupled with distancing hinders our most basic functions of all – since humans are genuinely social animals. Social interaction for us is both a frame and content, an evolutionary constant. Physical distancing which is named a social, cloth ribbon which is named a mask and rnk-messenger appliance which is named a vaccine – all three error in objecto trigger confusions, and spark increasing mistrust and growing disobedience. Eg. it is crucial to differentiate the physical from a social distancing. Physical one is a preventive (punitive or medical) measure while the so-called social distancing is a century-old concept of (empathy charge and) social engineering. To this end, see works of the US sociologists Park, Hall and Bogardus (scale of social distancing), and Simmel’s ‘theory of the stranger’ – Simmelian social geometry (Germany 1908).
 During times of crisis national security arguments are often evoked to deny information to be requested and accessed. However, it is exactly at such times that a timely and trustworthy information from official sources is most needed. Informational transparency in accordance with the principles set out in the Tromsø Convention prior to the C-19 pandemic could have helped to avoid the ‘infodemic’ and a subsequent massive public distrust.
 Analysing the specifications indicated by the manufacturers themselves, the genoccine seems more accurate name for the experimental (thoroughly untested), new, RNK/DNK modified, nanotechnology-based tri-injecting solution that is currently advocated for the C-19. Some critics even reject to call it vaccine, arguing that it is in fact a GMO implant/hacking device or geno-therapy (which needs to be administered periodically, while vaccine is a onetime shot). Such claims are ignored, but not refuted yet.
 See: “World on Autopilot: The UNSC should urgently address C-19”, New Europe Brussels (Bajrektarevic-Agam, 10 APR 20); “Contributing to a Safer, Healthier and Prosperous World”, Diplomat Magazine Hague (Bajrektarevic-Goutali, 12 MAY 20); ”Return of Global Stewardship: the UNSC should urgently address C-19 – addendum” (Bajrektarevic-Agam, 25 May 20), ModernDiplomacy Athens/ Brussels; “Democracy Vaccinated, – The post-Corona epilogue of Sino-American relations”, (Bajrektarevic), L’Europe Unie Intl. Journal, Revue d’études européenne, Paris, France 2020 (15) 2.
 Interestingly one of the very first works on the so-called New Age Normal (and European integration) originates from an unexpected place and unexpected times: A war time Nazi Minister for Economic Affairs and Head of the Reichsbank, Walther Funk, in his 1943 The Economic Face of the New Europe propagated ideas on the creation of a European economic area controlled by the New Germany. That puts as back to a 2020-circulated aphorism that vividly captured intellectual trap: “Is Corona illness or the test of intelligence?”
 On December 18th 2020, the UN General Assembly (UNGA) adopted Resolution against glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism and other practices that encourage modern forms of racism and xenophobia. 60 UN members co-sponsored resolution, while only 2 states casted negative vote. Rather strikingly and disturbingly, Germany refrained from voting in favour (abstained). The UN GA recommends states “to take appropriate concrete measures, including legislative and educational ones, in accordance with international human rights obligations, in order to prevent revisionism in respect of the Second World War and the denial of the crimes against humanity and war crimes committed during the WWII.”
 Soon we are going to retrospect on all what is happening today. What will we conclude? Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology, claims the following: “… There’ve been times when as a culture facing major crisis – war, famine, and the like – decisions have been made to cross ethical lines. (Sadly enough, Europeans are rich of such history, rem. aut.) It is convenient in fogs of war to rush on judgement calls where we say that the benefits merit compromising some of our core ethical principles. Invariably, in retrospect we always end up saying that was a grave mistake.”
 Detailed account about the Conflict of interests affecting judges of the European Court of Justice (ECHR) has been produced by the European Center for Law and Justice (May 30th 2021)– claiming that at least 20% of all judges might have had a troubling and long-lasting links with the non-European non-state sector. /see: One year after the report on NGOs and Judges of the ECHR: Overview (eclj.org) /
 While the EU officially insists on anti-Chinese narrative, deeds are telling contrary: Practically all prescribed face masks within the Union are manufactured in and shipped from China. Diagnostic kits for C-19 testing are also largely from China (in many Member states there are – contrary to the clear health regulations – available in pharmacies but without any inscription written in the language of that EU country). This sends disturbing image about inconstancy and inauthenticity of the EU rhetoric, as well as about the inability and incompetence of the Union to re-start production even of the low-tech items such as cloth masks. Finally, the largest and ‘most successful block in history of mankind’ was unable to insist on the existing cheap, safe and effective drugs, or to produce its own medicine related to the C-19. Only one of the (emergency use) approved vaccines in the EU is partially made in the EU (Sweden), but even that one fundamentally borrowed from the external research (Russian virology solutions).
 The European Union summit on Urgent response in May 2020 (May 07th) was hastily allocating billions of tax-payers’ money on the irrationally lionized, single-mandated, yet unseen, future medication – all that in a rather opaque and nontransparent way. However, what finally triggered enormous public outcry and further disfranchising was an euphoric closure of that summit by the Commission President Ursula von der Leyen (unelected Brussels’ top official). By many accounts, her final words told with a delight “Thank you Bill for your leadership” acknowledging and praising a lead role of the non-state actor who is not even European (and who was – not giving but – receiving lavish funds) was an all-time low of the European house and its representatives – ever since the Commission and other institutions of the Union exist.
 Although initially representing the asymmetric workings of the non-state actor, the so-called Sarajevo assassination of 1914 triggered the WWI – a gigantic trans-continental conflict between all major powers of that time (and a rapid demise of many of them, in just few years’ time). This self-destruction lasted for 4 years with all unconventional (biological and chemical) means than at disposal used. What has happened? The non-state actor from Bosnia assaulted the Head of State in-making of the major power (Heir to the Habsburg Empire). Now comes the most disturbing part: Asymmetric confrontation between the state and non-state actor in one corner of Europe (southeast) triggered a direct armed conflict and the immense bloodshed – but only months later and via spill over from the other corner of Europe. Militarily, the German attack on the Belgian Ardennes (northwest of Europe) marked the beginning of the total destruction – WWI. In summer 1945, Soviets were rushing through Korean peninsula to get a stake in forthcoming occupation of Japan. As a consequence, Americans repeatedly nuked that country’s inland. That much about controllability of (non-)intentionality and about mastering the outcome. Overconfidence (that easily turns into arrogance and ignorance and yet into miscalculation), is another (mass) killer. Just to recall but few history chapters by naming their chief protagonists: Darius III, Hannibal, Napoleon, Hitler, or places such as Điện Biên Phủ.
 For more on the topic see: Fukuyama’s defensive modernization, or author’s definition of anthropotechnique in his ‘Geopolitics of Quantum Buddhism’.
- Link (ENG): Analysis ● Prof. Dr. Anis H. Bajrektarevic: Of Health and Nuclear Holocaust (Intentionality, Directionality and Outcome) https://www.ifimes.org/en/
researches/of-health-and- nuclear-holocaust- intentionality-directionality- and-outcome/4992?
- Link (BSH): Analiza ● Prof. dr. Anis H. Bajrektarević: Kako izbjeći samouništenje zapada? (Iliti: Doba Isteklih Ljudskih prava) https://www.ifimes.org/ba/
istrazivanja/kako-izbjeci- samounistenje-zapada-iliti- doba-isteklih-ljudskih-prava/ 4993?
- Link (ENG): Analysis ● Dr J Scott Younger: IFIMES II: Population and pollution and urbanisation https://www.ifimes.org/en/
researches/ifimes-ii- population-and-pollution-and- urbanisation/4991?
- Link (ENG): Press release ● Donald J. Johnston the new President of IFIMES Advisory Board https://www.ifimes.org/sl/
sporocila-za-javnost/donald-j- johnston-novi-predsednik- svetovalnega-odbora-ifimes-a/ 4990?
- Link (BSH): Saopćenje za javnost ● Donald J. Johnston novi predsjednik Savjetodavnog odbora IFIMES-a https://www.ifimes.org/sl/
sporocila-za-javnost/donald-j- johnston-novi-predsednik- svetovalnega-odbora-ifimes-a/ 4990?
- Link (ENG): Analysis ● 2022 Bosnia and Herzegovina: From ‘non-paper’ to a crawling war https://www.ifimes.org/en/
researches/2022-bosnia-and- herzegovina-from-non-paper-to- a-crawling-war/4987?
- Link (BSH): Analiza ● Bosna i Hercegovina 2022: Od ‘non-papera’ do puzajućeg rata https://www.ifimes.org/ba/
istrazivanja/bosna-i- hercegovina-2022-od-non- papera-do-puzajuceg-rata/4986?
- Link (ENG): Analysis ● Dr Mohamad Zreik ● Lebanon 2022: The Geopolitics of Water Series, Part Three: Water: a commodity or a human right? https://www.ifimes.org/en/
researches/lebanon-2022-the- geopolitics-of-water-series- part-three-water-a-commodity- or-a-human-right/4985?
- Link (ENG): Analysis ● Dr Maria Smotrytska: Decarbonisation and Maritime Transhipment lines: Congested South vs Strategic North https://www.ifimes.org/en/
researches/decarbonisation- and-maritime-transhipment- lines-congested-south-vs- strategic-north/4984?
- Link (ENG): Analysis ● 2022 Serbia: Referendum – Chance for a turning point in judiciary https://www.ifimes.org/en/
researches/2022-serbia- referendum-chance-for-a- turning-point-in-judiciary/ 4983?
- Link (BSH): Analiza ● Srbija 2022: Referendum – šansa za prekretnicu u pravosuđu https://www.ifimes.org/ba/
istrazivanja/srbija-2022- referendum-sansa-za- prekretnicu-u-pravosudu/4979?
- Link (ENG): Press release: Director of IFIMES Zijad Bećirović met with Albanian President Ilir Meta https://www.ifimes.org/en/
press-releases/director-of- ifimes-met-with-albanian- president-ilir-meta/4981?
- Link (ENG): Analysis ● 2022 Open Balkan: One voice and an opportunity for all https://www.ifimes.org/en/
researches/2022-open-balkan- one-voice-and-an-opportunity- for-all/4978?
- Link (BSH): Analiza ● Otvoreni Balkan 2021: Jedan glas i šansa za sve https://www.ifimes.org/ba/
istrazivanja/otvoreni-balkan- 2021-jedan-glas-i-sansa-za- sve/4973?
- Link (ENG): Analysis ● Dr J Scott Younger: From Delta to Omicron – 2021; year in review https://www.ifimes.org/en/
researches/from-delta-to- omicron-2021-year-in-review/ 4977?
- Link (ENG): Analysis ● Juan Martin Gonzalez Cabañas: The triumph of Boric in Chile and the opportunity for a new regionalism https://www.ifimes.org/en/
researches/the-triumph-of- boric-in-chile-and-the- opportunity-for-a-new- regionalism/4972?
- Link (ENG): Analysis ● Prof. Dr. Anis H. Bajrektarevic: Unavoidability of Sino-American Rift: History of Strategic Decoupling https://www.ifimes.org/en/
researches/unavoidability-of- sino-american-rift-history-of- strategic-decoupling/4970?
- Link (BSH): Analiza ● Prof. dr. Anis H. Bajrektarević: Post-Corona epilog Sino-Američkog pregrijanog odnosa: Slijedi li promjena igre ili pobjeda? https://www.ifimes.org/ba/
istrazivanja/post-corona- epilog-sino-americkog- pregrijanog-odnosa-slijedi-li- promjena-igre-ili-pobjeda/4971 ?
- Link (ENG): Analysis ● Dr. Mohamad Zreik ● Lebanon 2021: The Geopolitics of Water Series, Part Two: Water Diplomacy to Deal with the Renaissance Dam Crisis https://www.ifimes.org/en/
researches/lebanon-2021-the- geopolitics-of-water-series- part-two-water-diplomacy-to- deal-with-the-renaissance-dam- crisis/4969?
- Link (ENG): Analysis ● Hellmut Lagos Koller: The Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty (TPNW): Wishful daydream or Historic milestone? https://www.ifimes.org/en/
researches/the-nuclear- weapons-ban-treaty-tpnw- wishful-daydream-or-historic- milestone/4968?
- Link (ENG): Analysis ● General (Rtd) Corneliu Pivariu: Lebanon – Quo vadis? https://www.ifimes.org/en/
- Link (ENG): Analysis ● 2021 Bosnia and Hercegovina: Most brutal attack on truth about Holocaust in XXI century directed and implemented by Milorad Dodik (SNSD) and Dragan Čović (HDZ) https://www.ifimes.org/en/
researches/2021-bosnia-and- hercegovina-most-brutal- attack-on-truth-about- holocaust-in-xxi-century- directed-and-implemented-by- milorad-dodik-snsd-and-dragan- covic-hdz/4966?
- Link (BSH): Analiza ● BiH 2021: Najbrutalniji napad na istinu o Holokaustu u 21. stoljeću u režiji i izvedbi Milorada Dodika (SNSD) i Dragana Čovića (HDZ) https://www.ifimes.org/ba/
istrazivanja/bih-2021- najbrutalniji-napad-na-istinu- o-holokaustu-u-21-stoljecu-u- reziji-i-izvedbi-milorada- dodika-snsd-i-dragana-covica- hdz/4963?
- Link (ENG): https://www.
europeanperspectives.org/en International scientific journal “European Perspectives
- Link (ENG): https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=645V9eryieI&t=5s (IFIMES presentation film)